{"id":7849,"date":"2024-11-04T19:02:00","date_gmt":"2024-11-04T19:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/"},"modified":"2026-02-12T22:26:09","modified_gmt":"2026-02-12T22:26:09","slug":"google-flights-indexing-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"The Indexing of Google Flights: The Empire Strikes Back &#8211; Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"bsf_rt_marker\"><\/div><p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em><span class=\"ui-provider a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z ab ac ae af ag ah ai aj ak\" dir=\"ltr\">EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE: This research has been published in two parts. <a href=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-i\">Part I<\/a> explains our research methodology and explores Google Flights&#8217; increasing dominance in organic search and its potential connection to regulatory pressure. Part II (below) examines how this shift has impacted airlines, flight aggregators, and OTAs, with detailed analysis of ranking data across different markets.\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<h2>How Have Google Flights Impacted Our Customers?<\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"TextRun SCXW205202059 BCX8\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"auto\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW205202059 BCX8\">To assess the impact <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW205202059 BCX8\">of the indexing of Google Flights on our customers, we looked at <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW205202059 BCX8\">58 AWR profiles for 55 airlines<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW205202059 BCX8\">,<\/span> <span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW205202059 BCX8\">23 countries, and 141,787 keywords across mobile and desktop.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"EOP SCXW205202059 BCX8\" data-ccp-props=\"{}\"><span class=\"TextRun SCXW31166909 BCX8\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"auto\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW31166909 BCX8\">We set the following criteria to select the airlines sample:<\/span><\/span> <\/span>The qualifying airlines are shown in the table below.<\/p>\n<p>The qualifying AWR profiles are shown in the table below.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>airTRFX implementations indexed more than three months before August 2024.<\/li>\n<li>airTRFX implementations in EN language.<\/li>\n<li>AWR profiles with more than 100 keywords.<\/li>\n<li>Current customers. \u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"SCXW15436942 BCX8\">\n<div class=\"ListContainerWrapper SCXW15436942 BCX8\">\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 1518.56px;\" border=\"1\"><colgroup> <col style=\"width: 30.2721%;\" \/> <col style=\"width: 21.8137%;\" \/> <col style=\"width: 25.0298%;\" \/> <col style=\"width: 22.8844%;\" \/><\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>Customer<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Device<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Tracked Country<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong># of Keywords<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">African Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">ZA<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">2,374<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">561<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">3,570<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">7,525<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">CA<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">8,238<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">CA<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">6,080<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">GB<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">2,924<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">5,493<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">4,756<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,327<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">BN<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">2,369<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">326<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">LV<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">286<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 73.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier (Caribbean Carrier)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,322<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">IE<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">3,761<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">African Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">ET<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,501<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">5,925<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">SA<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">134<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">CA<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">258<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,392<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">919<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Oceanian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">AU<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">143<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">MY<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">114<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">IN<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">323<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">KW<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">230<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">601<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">African Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">KE<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,048<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">GB<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,134<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">750<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">2,054<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Oceanian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">NZ<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,402<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">320<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">CA<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">638<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">PH<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">2,481<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">GB<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">191<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">SG<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,008<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">824<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">SG<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">361<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier (Caribbean Carrier)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">369<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">IN<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">441<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">LK<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">601<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Oceaninan Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">AU<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">3,935<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">111<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">GB<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">679<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">European Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">GB<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">7,306<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">African Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">RW<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">4,201<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">OM<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">429<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Asian Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">SA<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">299<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Oceaninan Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Mobile<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">AU<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">684<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">North American Carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">Desktop<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">US<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">1,294<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Table 2. Airlines selected for analyzing the impact of the indexing of Google Flights on airTRFX subscribers.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Google Flights Is Making Gains, But Most Customers Hold Strong\u00a0<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Although Google Flights\u2019 market share in organic search has expanded significantly, most of our customers maintain better rankings.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Figure-10-1.png\" alt=\"Percentage of customers outranking Google Flights in August 2024\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 10. Percentage of customers outranking Google Flights in August 2024.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>As of August 2024, Google Flights surpasses only 8 customers (14.5%) in the number of keywords in the top 5 positions. The site performs better on first-page visibility, outranking 17 (30.9%) airlines. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In general, customers significantly outperform Google Flights in both top 5 and first-page positions on desktop and mobile search results.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>On desktop, airlines maintain the top 5 positions for 36.4% of keywords\u2014over three times Google Flights\u2019 10.6%. Our customers also dominate first-page visibility, with 64.4% of keywords appearing on page one, compared to Google Flights\u2019 41.4%.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Figure-11-1.png\" alt=\"Customers vs. Google Flights keyword rankings as of August 2024 (Google Desktop).\" width=\"870\" height=\"527\" \/><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 11. Number of customers outranked by Google Flights from December 2023 to August 2024.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The same trend holds on mobile.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>On average, airTRFX subscribers achieve top 5 rankings for 49.7% of keywords, more than quadrupling Google Flights\u2019 10.9%. First-page presence also strongly favors airlines, with 67.9% of keywords appearing on page one, while Google Flights reaches only 38.8%.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Figure-12-1.png\" alt=\"Customers vs. Google Flights keyword rankings as of August 2024 (Google Mobile).\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 12. Customers vs. Google Flights keyword rankings as of August 2024 (Google Mobile).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Across both desktop and mobile, our customers consistently maintain superior search visibility. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The airlines\u2019 percentage of keywords in the top 5 is three to four times higher than Google Flights\u2019. While our customers consistently rank roughly two-thirds of keywords on first page, Google Flights falls short of 50%.\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Home Market Advantage<\/h2>\n<p>We found an interesting pattern when comparing how airlines perform against Google Flights in their home country\u2019s search results versus other countries\u2019 search results.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>We analyzed the ranking performance of airlines against that of Google Flights in two scenarios:\u00a0<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Rankings in airline\u2019s home country\u2019s search results (39 airlines)\u00a0<\/li>\n<li>Rankings in other countries\u2019 search results (17 airlines)\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Figure-13.png\" alt=\"Customer and Google Flights keyword ranking performance based on the airlines\u2019 SERP location (August 2024)\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span class=\"WACImageContainer NoPadding DragDrop BlobObject SCXW151475902 BCX8\" role=\"presentation\"><span class=\"WACImageBorder SCXW151475902 BCX8\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 13. Customer and Google Flights keyword ranking performance based on the airlines\u2019 SERP location (August 2024).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>In home country search results, only 3 out of 39 airlines (7.7%) perform worse than Google Flights in the top 5 positions. In contrast, when looking at search results from countries outside an airline\u2019s home market, 29.4% of airlines (5 out of 17) have fewer keywords in the top 5 than Google Flights. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This trend extends to first-page rankings as well. In their home country\u2019s search results, roughly 23% of airlines (9 out of 39) underperform Google Flights. However, in foreign market search results, Google Flights has better first-page rankings than almost half of the airlines (8 out of 17). \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>These data points indicate that airlines are more resilient against Google Flights in their home country\u2019s search results. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Flight Aggregators and OTAs Losing Ground to Google Flights<\/h2>\n<p>With all this progress that Google Flights made, there sure must be some losers, right? We already saw a few airlines that Google Flights outranked, but what about flight aggregator sites or OTAs?\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>We looked at flight aggregators and OTAs that lost ground to Google Flights in advanced economies where English is the predominant language (remember that the localized Google Flights pages are not yet indexable): the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada (CA), Australia (AU), Ireland (IE), and New Zealand (NZ).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In total, we analyzed 46,404 keywords across these countries.\u00a0<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;\" border=\"1\"><colgroup> <col style=\"width: 33.3333%;\" \/> <col style=\"width: 33.3333%;\" \/> <col style=\"width: 33.3333%;\" \/><\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Country (Code)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong># of Keywords (Desktop)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong># of Keywords (Mobile)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">United States (US)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">18,865<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">United Kingdom (UK)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">14,306<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Canada (CA)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">4,702<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Australia (AU)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">4,458<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Ireland (IE)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">2,671<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">New Zealand (NZ)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">1,402<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Table 3. Number of keywords by selected countries to determine flight aggregator sites and OTAs that Google Flights outranked.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>How did we measure \u201closing ground to Google Flights\u201d? We defined the \u201closers\u201d based on these criteria:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Had at least 15% of keywords on first page in December 2023.<\/li>\n<li>Had a higher percentage of keywords on first page than Google Flights in December 2023.<\/li>\n<li>Had a lower percentage of keywords on first page than by Google Flights in August 2024.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Looking at the change in the percentage of keywords on first page, here are the online travel companies that Google Flights outranked in the selected countries:<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 437.812px;\" border=\"1\"><colgroup> <col style=\"width: 50%;\" \/> <col style=\"width: 50%;\" \/><\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>Company<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Countries<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Momondo<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">US, UK, CA, AU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Kiwi.com<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">UA, AU, NZ, IE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Trip.com<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">UK, CA, NZ, IE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Farecompare<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">UK, AU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Cheapflights<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">UK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Rome2Rio<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">AU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Wego<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">AU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Cleartrip<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">UK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 43.7812px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Travelocity<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">CA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Flights.com<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">US<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Orbitz<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">US<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Lastminute.com<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">UK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">CheapOair<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">CA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Iwantthatflight<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">AU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Flightsfrom.com<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">UK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Table 4. Companies outranked by Google Flights in the selected countries. The company names are written as they appear on their websites. A company may have multiple domains.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Let\u2019s quickly dive into each country. The charts below show the percentage of keywords on first page for the top 5 impacted domains in each country.<\/p>\n<h3>United States<\/h3>\n<p>The mobile ranking data in the US shows Google Flights&#8217; dramatic visibility increase, climbing from 22.9% to 47.6% (+24.7 pp) &#8211; the highest growth across all markets. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Orbitz.com was the only site showing positive movement, with a modest 1.0 pp increase. Other domains experienced varying degrees of decline, with flights.com seeing the steepest drop (-10.4 pp), followed by kiwi.com (-5.0 pp).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/google-flights-outranking-leading-online-travel-sites-mobile-search-results-flight-related-queries-us-graphic_niooem-1.png\" alt=\"Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (US) graphic\" width=\"870\" height=\"468\" \/><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 14. Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (US).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>United Kingdom<\/h3>\n<p>In the UK, Google Flights also showed impressive growth, more than doubling its presence from 13.2% to 30.6% (+17.4 pp).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Trip.com suffered a large ranking loss, with www.trip.com dropping by 16.9 pp and uk.trip.com declining by 14.6 pp. Notably, cheapflights.co.uk maintained relative stability with only a minimal decrease of 0.1 pp, while both www.momondo.co.uk and www.lastminute.com saw declines, too (-3.5 pp and \u20134.9 pp, respectively).<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/google-flights-outranking-leading-online-travel-sites-mobile-search-results-flight-related-queries-uk-graphic_rcnoyg-1.png\" alt=\"Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (UK) graphic\" width=\"870\" height=\"463\" \/><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 15. Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (UK).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Canada<\/h3>\n<p>While Google Flights rankings in Canada didn\u2019t expand as much as in the US and the UK, they also improved, growing from 21.4% to 30.7% (+9.3 pp).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Meanwhile, trip.com experienced the most severe decline, dropping from 30.2% to 7.5% (-22.7 pp). Other important players like momondo.ca and travelocity.ca also saw considerable decreases, falling by 10.8 pp and 8.1 pp, respectively.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/google-flights-outranking-leading-online-travel-sites-desktop-search-results-flight-related-queries-ca-graphic_mcpfaj-1.png\" alt=\"Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in desktop search results for flight-related queries (CA) graphic\" width=\"870\" height=\"478\" \/><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 16. Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in desktop search results for flight-related queries (CA).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Australia<\/h3>\n<p>First-page rankings for Google Flights in Australia increased from a modest 3.8% to 13.4% (+9.6 pp). This growth contrasts with declines in other domains in the market.<\/p>\n<p>The most dramatic drops were seen in farecompare.com (-15.5 pp), cleartrip.com (-10.6 pp), and iwantthatflight.com.au (-10.2 pp).<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/google-flights-outranking-leading-online-travel-sites-mobile-search-results-flight-related-queries-au-graphic_gamzjb-1.png\" alt=\"Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (AU) graphic\" width=\"870\" height=\"456\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 17. Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (AU).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>New Zealand<\/h3>\n<p>Let\u2019s just say that New Zealand wasn\u2019t the best success story for Google Flights, but the site\u2019s rankings still grew from 14.8% to 23.0% (+8.2 pp).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Once again, www.kiwi.com and www.trip.com experienced notable declines, dropping their first-page rankings by 21.3 pp and 10.9 pp, respectively.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/google-flights-outranking-leading-online-travel-sites-mobile-search-results-flight-related-queries-nz-graphic_lvc8w2-1.png\" alt=\"Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (NZ) graphic\" width=\"870\" height=\"394\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 18. Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in mobile search results for flight-related queries (NZ).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Ireland<\/h3>\n<p>Who lost rankings to Google Flights in Ireland? The usual suspects: both www.kiwi.com and www.trip.com lost first-page rankings by 23 pp and 28 pp, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Google Flights, as expected, increased from roughly 35% of keywords on first page to around 50%, a 15 pp jump.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Ireland-Google-Flights-1.png\" alt=\"Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in desktop search results for flight-related queries (IE)\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span class=\"WACImageContainer NoPadding DragDrop BlobObject SCXW222507986 BCX8\" role=\"presentation\"><span class=\"WACImageBorder SCXW222507986 BCX8\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 19. Google Flights outranking leading online travel sites in desktop search results for flight-related queries (IE).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Hardest-Hit Flight Aggregator Sites<\/h2>\n<p>If you ran to a third-party tool to see that beautiful chart showing a decline in traffic for these sites but didn\u2019t quite get what you expected, remember that the data is based on keyword rankings, not traffic.<\/p>\n<p>This means that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>As explained earlier, we track specific flight-related queries (\u201ckeyword permutations\u201d).<\/li>\n<li>Some keywords can generate vast amounts of traffic, but others, especially those connected to less popular destinations, may not bring noticeable traffic, according to third-party tools.<\/li>\n<li>The analysis was done for a specific domain, country, and device.<\/li>\n<li>Some sites barely decreased the percentage of keywords on first page (e.g., www.cheapflights.co.uk in the UK).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Therefore, it is possible for a third-party tool to not show a substantial traffic decline for some of the impacted domains.<\/p>\n<p>That said, we did find some of the impacted travel booking sites showing a decreasing trend, starting in August 2023, around the time Google Flights started to index its site, specifically:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>www.trip.com<\/li>\n<li>www.kiwi.com<\/li>\n<li>www.lastminute.com<\/li>\n<li>www.cheapflights.com<\/li>\n<li>www.orbitz.com<\/li>\n<li>www.momondo.com<\/li>\n<li>www.flightsfrom.com<\/li>\n<li>www.flights.com<\/li>\n<li>www.farecompare.com<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The Ahrefs chart below shows the decreasing traffic for the top five domains in the list.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/global-traffic-decreased-top-five-domains-google-flights-outranked-graphic_ybj8dy-1.png\" alt=\"Global traffic decreased for the top five domains that Google Flights outranked graphic\" width=\"624\" height=\"256\" \/><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Figure 20. Global traffic decreased for the top five domains that Google Flights outranked, according to Ahrefs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>However, probably the best way to look at traffic data is on SEMrush after applying keyword, device, and country filters.<\/p>\n<h2>Is Google Flights to Blame?<\/h2>\n<p>We are not saying that the decline of these sites is exclusively due to the emergence of Google Flights\u2019 domain.<\/p>\n<p>However, the data suggests a significant shift in SERPs for flight-related queries, with Google Flights steadily gaining market share while traditional flight search sites are losing visibility. This trend is consistent across mobile and desktop searches and different geographical markets, indicating a systematic change in SERPs favoring Google Flights.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>Our research reveals a dramatic improvement in Google Flights&#8217; organic rankings for flight-related searches across multiple markets. We suspect this is a deliberate move to establish a solid organic presence, potentially as a hedge against regulatory restrictions on SERP features and self-preferencing in search results.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>As if pinning a Google Flights box at the top of search results wasn\u2019t enough, its website has become a major organic competitor to airlines and travel booking companies. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Some established flight aggregators and OTAs have been the hardest hit, with players like Momondo, Kiwi.com, and Trip.com experiencing significant ranking declines across multiple markets. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>While our customers have shown resilience, particularly in their home markets, the growing strength of Google Flights poses a potential threat, with 30% of analyzed airlines now having fewer first-page rankings than Google Flights. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>However, airlines can effectively compete against and outperform Google Flights in organic search. Our customers set a strong example. They show 3-4 times more top-5 rankings than Google Flights while maintaining roughly two-thirds of keywords on the first page. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>We want to update our findings with more recent data, but looking ahead these results raise important questions about:\u00a0<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The future of SERPs for flight-related searches in an increasingly Google-dominated landscape.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li>The potential need for even further regulatory oversight of Google&#8217;s self-preferencing in SERPs. \u00a0<\/li>\n<li>The value of specialized SEO solutions for airlines, such as airTRFX. \u00a0<\/li>\n<li>The importance of market-specific SEO strategies for airlines that can secure better ranking positions, at least in their primary markets.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n<div class=\"schema-faq wp-block-yoast-faq-block\"><div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1759512866646\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\"><strong>What is the impact of Google Flights indexing on airlines?<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Google Flights has gained significant visibility in organic search, but most airlines maintain strong rankings, especially in their home markets. Airlines using tailored SEO strategies, like airTRFX, outperform Google Flights in top rankings and first-page visibility.\u00a0<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1759512876675\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\"><strong>How does Google Flights affect flight aggregators and OTAs?<\/strong><\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Flight aggregators and OTAs, such as Momondo, Kiwi.com, and Trip.com, have experienced ranking declines in multiple markets as Google Flights gains ground in organic search results.\u00a0<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1759512885184\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\"><strong>Why do airlines perform better in their home markets?<\/strong><\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Airlines have a home market advantage, with stronger rankings in their local search results compared to foreign markets. This is due to localized SEO strategies and brand familiarity within their primary regions.\u00a0<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1759512894563\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\"><strong>What SEO strategies can airlines use to compete with Google Flights?<\/strong><\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Airlines can leverage specialized SEO solutions like airTRFX, focus on market-specific strategies, and optimize for localized search to maintain strong rankings and visibility against Google Flights.\u00a0<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1759512904685\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\"><strong>How has Google Flights reshaped the flight search landscape?<\/strong><\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Google Flights has become a major competitor in organic search, challenging traditional flight aggregators and OTAs. Its growing presence highlights the need for airlines and OTAs to adopt advanced SEO strategies to stay competitive.\u00a0<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1759512914982\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\"><strong>Which markets have seen the most significant impact from Google Flights?<\/strong><\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Markets like the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada have experienced the largest shifts, with Google Flights gaining substantial first-page visibility and outranking several OTAs and aggregators.\u00a0<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1759512923849\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\"><strong>What are the long-term implications of Google Flights&#8217; growth?<\/strong><\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">The rise of Google Flights in organic search raises questions about the future of SERPs for flight-related queries, the need for regulatory oversight, and the importance of advanced SEO solutions for airlines and OTAs to maintain competitiveness.\u00a0<\/p> <\/div> <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Analyze how Google Flights indexing impacts airline SEO, OTAs, and flight aggregators, and explore strategies airlines use to maintain search visibility in competitive markets.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":7848,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[152],"tags":[346,97,565,564,567,568,571,60,47,46,572,566,176,570,569,48],"class_list":["post-7849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-airline-seo-strategies","tag-algolia-no-index","tag-flight-aggregator-seo-challenges","tag-google-flights-indexing-impact","tag-google-flights-vs-otas","tag-how-google-flights-affects-airline-seo-rankings","tag-impact-of-google-flights-on-organic-search-visibility","tag-industry-airlines","tag-label-blog-post","tag-language-english","tag-maintaining-top-rankings-against-google-flights","tag-organic-search-for-airlines","tag-product-offer-marketing","tag-seo-challenges-for-otas-in-flight-search","tag-strategies-for-airlines-to-compete-with-google-flights","tag-type-blog","post-type-blogs"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Google Flights Indexing Impact on Airlines and OTAs (Part II) | PROS<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Analyze how Google Flights indexing impacts airline SEO, OTAs, and flight aggregators, and explore strategies airlines use to maintain search visibility in competitive markets\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Google Flights Indexing Impact on Airlines and OTAs (Part II) | PROS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Discover how Google Flights is reshaping airline search visibility and how airlines can protect rankings against OTAs and aggregators.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"PROS Resources Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PROSInc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-04T19:02:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-12T22:26:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/indexing-google-flights-empire-strikes-back-thumbnail_fqtst5-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"870\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"473\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Enmanuel Tirado\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Google Flights Indexing Impact on Airlines and OTAs (Part II) | PROS","description":"Analyze how Google Flights indexing impacts airline SEO, OTAs, and flight aggregators, and explore strategies airlines use to maintain search visibility in competitive markets","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Google Flights Indexing Impact on Airlines and OTAs (Part II) | PROS","og_description":"Discover how Google Flights is reshaping airline search visibility and how airlines can protect rankings against OTAs and aggregators.","og_url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/","og_site_name":"PROS Resources Center","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PROSInc","article_published_time":"2024-11-04T19:02:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-12T22:26:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":870,"height":473,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/indexing-google-flights-empire-strikes-back-thumbnail_fqtst5-3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Enmanuel Tirado","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/"},"author":{"name":"Enmanuel Tirado","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#\/schema\/person\/80b521c027b78ec92e9be21f143ae4ca"},"headline":"The Indexing of Google Flights: The Empire Strikes Back &#8211; Part II","datePublished":"2024-11-04T19:02:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-12T22:26:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/"},"wordCount":2419,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/indexing-google-flights-empire-strikes-back-thumbnail_fqtst5-3.jpg","keywords":["Airline SEO strategies","algolia-no-index","Flight aggregator SEO challenges","Google Flights indexing impact","Google Flights vs OTAs","How Google Flights affects airline SEO rankings","Impact of Google Flights on organic search visibility","industry-airlines","label-blog-post","language-english","Maintaining top rankings against Google Flights","Organic search for airlines","product-offer-marketing","SEO challenges for OTAs in flight search","Strategies for airlines to compete with Google Flights","type-blog"],"articleSection":["Blog"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","FAQPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/","url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/","name":"Google Flights Indexing Impact on Airlines and OTAs (Part II) | PROS","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/indexing-google-flights-empire-strikes-back-thumbnail_fqtst5-3.jpg","datePublished":"2024-11-04T19:02:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-12T22:26:09+00:00","description":"Analyze how Google Flights indexing impacts airline SEO, OTAs, and flight aggregators, and explore strategies airlines use to maintain search visibility in competitive markets","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#breadcrumb"},"mainEntity":[{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512866646"},{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512876675"},{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512885184"},{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512894563"},{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512904685"},{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512914982"},{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512923849"}],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/indexing-google-flights-empire-strikes-back-thumbnail_fqtst5-3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/indexing-google-flights-empire-strikes-back-thumbnail_fqtst5-3.jpg","width":870,"height":473},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Resources","item":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The Indexing of Google Flights: The Empire Strikes Back &#8211; Part II"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#website","url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/","name":"PROS Resources Center","description":"AI-powered airline retailing and offer management platform","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#organization","name":"PROS, Inc.","url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/social-default.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/social-default.png","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"PROS, Inc."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PROSInc","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/pros.inc\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/pros\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/PROSpricing"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/#\/schema\/person\/80b521c027b78ec92e9be21f143ae4ca","name":"Enmanuel Tirado","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/enmanuel-tirado-headshot_jvx02g-3-150x150.png","url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/enmanuel-tirado-headshot_jvx02g-3-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/enmanuel-tirado-headshot_jvx02g-3-150x150.png","caption":"Enmanuel Tirado"},"description":"Enmanuel Tirado is the Head of SEO &amp; Digital Analytics at PROS Holdings, based in Houston, Texas. A recognized thought leader in airline SEO, Enmanuel has designed cutting-edge SEO strategies for over a hundred airlines. Under his direction, PROS\u2019s SEO solutions have driven multimillion-dollar annual organic revenue increases for national and international carriers. Enmanuel also combines deep industry expertise with statistical analysis to establish benchmarks and best practices that have revolutionized the airline SEO landscape. His work extends beyond traditional SEO, encompassing digital analytics, conversion rate optimization, and product performance measurement across PROS\u2019 solution portfolio. Some of his notable publications include \u201cThe Ultimate SEO Guide Airlines,\u201d \u201cCore Web Vitals Optimization for Airlines,\u201d and \u201cThe Indexing of Google Fights: The Empire Strikes Back.\u201d His work is regarded as the gold standard in airline SEO, making him one of the most sought-after experts in this highly specialized field.","url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/author\/enmanuel-tirado\/"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512866646","position":1,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512866646","name":"What is the impact of Google Flights indexing on airlines?\u00a0","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Google Flights has gained significant visibility in organic search, but most airlines maintain strong rankings, especially in their home markets. Airlines using tailored SEO strategies, like airTRFX, outperform Google Flights in top rankings and first-page visibility.\u00a0","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512876675","position":2,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512876675","name":"How does Google Flights affect flight aggregators and OTAs?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Flight aggregators and OTAs, such as Momondo, Kiwi.com, and Trip.com, have experienced ranking declines in multiple markets as Google Flights gains ground in organic search results.\u00a0","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512885184","position":3,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512885184","name":"Why do airlines perform better in their home markets?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Airlines have a home market advantage, with stronger rankings in their local search results compared to foreign markets. This is due to localized SEO strategies and brand familiarity within their primary regions.\u00a0","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512894563","position":4,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512894563","name":"What SEO strategies can airlines use to compete with Google Flights?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Airlines can leverage specialized SEO solutions like airTRFX, focus on market-specific strategies, and optimize for localized search to maintain strong rankings and visibility against Google Flights.\u00a0","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512904685","position":5,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512904685","name":"How has Google Flights reshaped the flight search landscape?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Google Flights has become a major competitor in organic search, challenging traditional flight aggregators and OTAs. Its growing presence highlights the need for airlines and OTAs to adopt advanced SEO strategies to stay competitive.\u00a0","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512914982","position":6,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512914982","name":"Which markets have seen the most significant impact from Google Flights?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Markets like the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada have experienced the largest shifts, with Google Flights gaining substantial first-page visibility and outranking several OTAs and aggregators.\u00a0","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512923849","position":7,"url":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/blog\/google-flights-indexing-ii\/#faq-question-1759512923849","name":"What are the long-term implications of Google Flights' growth?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The rise of Google Flights in organic search raises questions about the future of SERPs for flight-related queries, the need for regulatory oversight, and the importance of advanced SEO solutions for airlines and OTAs to maintain competitiveness.\u00a0","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7849"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7849\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7848"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pros.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}